Give us a call: + 1(866) 6SKYBOX
(+1 (408) 441-8060)
Send an email to: info@skyboxsecurity.com
Visit our Resource Center
Background: This large financial services company operates one of the world's largest retail electronic payments network and is one of the most recognized global financial services brands. The company provides secure convenient and reliable payment options in 170 countries and territories.
Challenges: The financial services firm processes a high volume of credit card transactions and must demonstrate compliance with the most stringent Level 1 PCI DSS requirements. In addition the publicly-traded company has fiduciary responsibilities as well as responsibilities to its customers to ensure the confidence of their sensitive credit card data. And of course brand name protection is critical.
In addition to achieving and maintaining PCI DSS compliance, the security team of the company is required to comply with California SB1386 and AB1950 privacy requirements, supporting the audit information needs of litigation defense when necessary. Many of the PCI requirements that the company must meet are network-related and therefore complex issues to tackle due to:
· The dizzying pace of firewall changes
· A staggering number of rules
· Difficulty in determining whether changes are in compliance
· Interpretation of firewall policies by engineers
· Optimizing firewall rules
The complexities of a firewall audit for a typical Fortune 500 company are high and for this large global financial services company the complexities are exponentially higher as illustrated in the table below.
Industry Firewall Comparison
|
Description |
Typical Fortune 500 Company |
This Global Financial Services Company |
| Average Rules |
144 |
2,000 |
| Maximum Rules |
700 |
40,000 |
| Objects |
968 |
5,000 |
| Interfaces |
4 |
8 |
Solution provided: The company determined that an automated firewall audit approach was necessary to meet the goals of its PCI DSS compliance process. They evaluated a variety of solutions based on the evaluation criteria below:
Evaluation Criteria
|
Regulatory reporting (NIST PCI) |
Impact or What-If analysis |
Stability and Usability |
|
Firewall compliance to policy |
Comparison analysis |
Performance |
|
Customizable policies |
Multi vendor product support |
Scalability |
|
Rules optimization |
Topology awareness and graphical display |
Support (fast quick changes) |
|
No latency or risk to production environment |
Adhoc queries |
Direct & automated data collection |
The company chose Skybox Security due to its unique risk-based approach to firewall and network compliance analysis and change assurance. First introduced in 2007, the Skybox solution for this deployment is composed of two products, Firewall Compliance Auditor and Network Compliance Auditor.
By continuously collecting and analyzing information from multiple firewalls and network access devices, this solution automates the process of conducting firewall and network audits. IT security and IT operations managers can easily and quickly obtain a comprehensive view of their firewall or network compliance status. Pinpointing the root cause of policy violations is quick, as is predicting and validating proposed configuration changes before they are deployed. The customer reports a dramatic reduction in the time to complete compliance audits - from weeks to just minutes. This is particularly important for organizations that must maintain PCI compliance. When used together the products also enable network operation professionals to eliminate unused or ineffective rules and objects.
The company chose Skybox Security in order to achieve all their firewall compliance needs while at the same time ensuring that there are no wide open sources destinations or ports that would compromise the security of their systems and enforcing key controls and security policies. The company identified and completed these five deployment stages.
Summary: By automating the PCI DSS compliance process with Skybox Security the company is able to move faster more efficiently and with confidence that they are compliant every day of the year -- not just during audit season. The company achieved the following benefits:
· 3-6 months ROI
· 60% reduction in change research effort
· Security engineers do not need to be policy experts
· Operations teams don’t need to know multiple firewalls rules syntax
· Brings to light redundant misplaced or non-optimized firewall rules
· Processes are better communicated easier to follow and more consistent
Plus the company reported the unexpected benefits of regaining credibility with customers; establishing an authoritative single source of information; and easier federation of firewalls. These two tables demonstrate the ROI of manual firewall related audits compared to an automated approach.
Automated vs. Manual Firewall and Network Audits
| Description | Previous Process at Company | Results wtih Skybox Security |
| Mitigation research – minimum time |
15 minutes |
10 seconds |
|
Mitiation research – average time |
2 hours |
30 seconds |
| Mitigation research – maximum time |
16 hours |
2 minutes |
| Research expertise |
Not a core competency |
World-class results |
| Packet analysis combinations |
Analysis limited to 5 most critical rules |
In millions |
| Typical firewall analysis time |
10 hours |
2 minutes |
| Per change analysis speed |
300x, 9FTE’s required |
1x, 3FTE’s required |
| Analysis accuracy |
70% |
95% |
| Firewalls analyzed |
1, Weekly |
100+, Daily |
| Vulnerabilities detected |
5-10 |
In millions |
| Employee burnout |
2 weeks |
None |
| Compliance assessments |
Annually, and VERY stressful |
Daily, automated, easy |
Skybox Security
2077 Gateway Place Suite 550
San Jose CA 95110
Source:http://www.infosecurityproductsguide.com/casestudies/2009/index.html