Skybox Awarded Best Deployment Strategy by Info Security Products Guide

Background: This large financial services company operates one of the world's largest retail electronic payments network and is one of the most recognized global financial services brands. The company provides secure convenient and reliable payment options in 170 countries and territories.

Challenges: The financial services firm processes a high volume of credit card transactions and must demonstrate compliance with the most stringent Level 1 PCI DSS requirements. In addition the publicly-traded company has fiduciary responsibilities as well as responsibilities to its customers to ensure the confidence of their sensitive credit card data. And of course brand name protection is critical. 

In addition to achieving and maintaining PCI DSS compliance, the security team of the company is required to comply with California SB1386 and AB1950 privacy requirements, supporting the audit information needs of litigation defense when necessary.  Many of the PCI requirements that the company must meet are network-related and therefore complex issues to tackle due to: 

·         The dizzying pace of firewall changes
·         A staggering number of rules
·         Difficulty in determining whether changes are in compliance
·         Interpretation of firewall policies by engineers
·         Optimizing firewall rules

The complexities of a firewall audit for a typical Fortune 500 company are high and for this large global financial services company the complexities are exponentially higher as illustrated in the table below.

Industry Firewall Comparison

Description

Typical Fortune 500 Company

This Global Financial Services Company

Average Rules

144

2,000

Maximum Rules

700

40,000

Objects

968

5,000

Interfaces

4

8

 

Best Deployment Scenario - PCI DSS Compliance

Solution provided: The company determined that an automated firewall audit approach was necessary to meet the goals of its PCI DSS compliance process. They evaluated a variety of solutions based on the evaluation criteria below:

Evaluation Criteria

Regulatory reporting (NIST PCI)

Impact or What-If analysis

Stability and Usability

Firewall compliance to policy

Comparison analysis

Performance

Customizable policies

Multi vendor product support

Scalability

Rules optimization

Topology awareness and graphical display

Support (fast quick changes)

No latency or risk to production environment

Adhoc queries

Direct & automated data collection

 

The company chose Skybox Security due to its unique risk-based approach to firewall and network compliance analysis and change assurance. First introduced in 2007, the Skybox solution for this deployment is composed of two products, Firewall Compliance Auditor and Network Compliance Auditor. 

By continuously collecting and analyzing information from multiple firewalls and network access devices, this solution automates the process of conducting firewall and network audits. IT security and IT operations managers can easily and quickly obtain a comprehensive view of their firewall or network compliance status. Pinpointing the root cause of policy violations is quick, as is predicting and validating proposed configuration changes before they are deployed. The customer reports a dramatic reduction in the time to complete compliance audits - from weeks to just minutes. This is particularly important for organizations that must maintain PCI compliance. When used together the products also enable network operation professionals to eliminate unused or ineffective rules and objects. 

The company chose Skybox Security in order to achieve all their firewall compliance needs while at the same time ensuring that there are no wide open sources destinations or ports that would compromise the security of their systems and enforcing key controls and security policies.  The company identified and completed these five deployment stages.

Summary: By automating the PCI DSS compliance process with Skybox Security the company is able to move faster more efficiently and with confidence that they are compliant every day of the year -- not just during audit season.  The company achieved the following benefits:

·         3-6 months ROI
·         60% reduction in change research effort
·         Security engineers do not need to be policy experts
·         Operations teams don’t need to know multiple firewalls rules syntax
·         Brings to light redundant misplaced or non-optimized firewall rules
·         Processes are better communicated easier to follow and more consistent

Plus the company reported the unexpected benefits of regaining credibility with customers; establishing an authoritative single source of information; and easier federation of firewalls. These two tables demonstrate the ROI of manual firewall related audits compared to an automated approach. 
 

 

Automated vs. Manual Firewall and Network Audits

Description Previous Process at Company Results wtih Skybox Security
Mitigation research – minimum time

15 minutes

10 seconds

Mitiation research – average time

2 hours

30 seconds

Mitigation research – maximum time

16 hours

2 minutes

Research expertise

Not a core competency

World-class results

Packet analysis combinations

Analysis limited to 5 most critical rules

In millions

Typical firewall analysis time

10 hours

2 minutes

Per change analysis speed

300x, 9FTE’s required

1x, 3FTE’s required

Analysis accuracy

70%

95%

Firewalls analyzed

1, Weekly

100+, Daily

Vulnerabilities detected

5-10

In millions

Employee burnout

2 weeks

None

Compliance assessments

Annually, and VERY stressful

Daily, automated, easy

 

Skybox Security 
2077 Gateway Place Suite 550 
San Jose CA 95110

Source:http://www.infosecurityproductsguide.com/casestudies/2009/index.html