In Cisco’s 2011 Global Threat Report, they note that “there is no ‘silver bullet’ for identifying them [Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs)] in a network.” And it is true. There isn’t.
One of the main strengths of the report is that it acts as a reminder to every security professional of the cyber threats we face every day. I agree with the report that no single approach to defending an organization from APTs is going to be work. However, the report does not address several key issues that impact the ability of the security team to effectively mitigate risk.
There are two vital elements and a mindset that security professionals should consider when protecting their organization from APTs: Proactive Risk Reduction, and Automation.
Practice proactive risk reduction. In the report, the set of recommendations are exclusively reactive -- suggesting that you can reduce the damage of APTs by reacting faster to incidents. Reducing the risk level *before* the attack occurs is better, and complimentary.
The report begins by reminding us that an intruder bent on stealing corporate secrets no longer needs to gain physical access to do so. But just because that is the case – it doesn’t mean you should throw out lessons learned in a different arena.
Let’s say you’re a facilities security manager and you must reduce risk. Your job is to keep unauthorized people out. The building has 100’s of ways in – doors, windows, skylights, holes in the roof, and tunnels. Would you decide to station personnel at every point of entry? Probably not. If you could, would you permanently close off the unnecessary points of entry? Yes. Similar to cyber security, this approach closes off many attack vectors and reduces the amount of monitoring and effort required to check for intruders at the few access points left. Bonus - you reduce the potential for remediation workload.
Automation is vital. Using a highly skilled security team to figure out which of 20,000 vulnerabilities need to be patched every week doesn’t give them a lot of time left over to look for a serious security incident – that may or may not exist. It’s amazing the amount of time and money spent collecting, correlating, verifying, prioritizing and analyzing data that is 80-90% noise.
Security teams are already overburdened and overextended. The sheer deluge of security incidents, data produced by security controls, and the growing complexity of enterprise networks means the game is stacked. Automating the most resource-intensive security activities – such as data collection, correlation, analysis, and prioritizing incidents means that the security team can focus their attention on the most critical security tasks and levels the playing field.
My suggestion to security personnel trying to find an effective way to deal with Advanced Persistent Threats is that they need to consider how to deploy “Advanced Persistent Security” in their organizations. Using intelligent and proactive tools to find and mitigate risks, plus automation to use daily and repeat often, is a pragmatic approach for effective security management.